Monday, June 4, 2007

Ruby Lake Watershed

We have just received these photos from Mary B. at Ruby Lake. Here is how she describes the images: "The attached pictures were taken of the proposed Ruby Lake cutblock in February and March of this year. The area to be cut is the high point of the ridge between Ruby Lake and the Agamemnon Channel and plans include the removal of two enormous wild life snags favoured by the eagles and ravens as a launching point for their aerial displays."

As well, Mary writes, " We have the added joy of being a short hike from Interfor's forest management of the Ambrose Lake watershed. It took two years for bird populations to return to normal after that one. Now, Tsain-Ko wants to remove the remaining crown forest areas at Ruby Lake."

Mary raises the issue of wildlife which we must not forget to include in our arguments to save the forests. We have seen a marked increase in the coyote and bear population up this end of the peninsula over the last year and it must be due to the blistering pace of development in the Sechelt and Pender Harbour areas. These animals are moving up into our forests. Where can they go next? There is no point in them swimming across the Narrows because there are no damn trees left on the other side. From Killam Bay down through the rapids to Highland Point inside Sechelt Inlet, the forests on that side have been "managed" into oblivion.


2 comments:

Judy Griffith Gill said...

This is a copy of a letter I posted to Mr. Forrester on Saturaday. This being Tuesday, and having received no response as yet, I've decided to post it here so others might take inspiration from it and write to the man as well.

June 2,2007
Mr. Forrester:
I want to go on record as being diametrically opposed to any watershed logging anywhere in the Province of BC. While I am aware that the best and biggest trees can often be found in watersheds, logging them not only destroys salmonid habitat, it imperils groundwater sources, upon which many Egmont residents rely, due to the high arsenic content of drilled water wells.


Indeed, the only potable water available to the house where I grew up is from a groundwater well. If logging proceeds on or near Maple Road in Egmont, that source of water is put at risk. Surely a viable solution can be found, a means by which Tsain-Ko can exercise their rights to use the forest without destroying other, equally important rights--especially the right to clean, safe water for drinking now and in the future.


Please listen to those of us who will be affected by any actions you might approve. We have nowhere to turn but to you.


Sincerely,

Judy Griffith Gill

merganser said...

Well said, Judy. Thanks for posting your letter. By the way, we learned yesterday that Mr. Forrester is now away for the next one to two weeks. He told me one but another couple attempting to reach him yesterday was informed by someone answering the phone it would be two weeks. So we ask anyone writing to him today to be sure to send a copy to us at info@ravagedegmont.com. We want to make sure all emails to him today are included in this June 6th deadline.